Picture of Court Website design on desktop and mobile

New York State Courts

Responsive Website and Online Dispute Resolution

Background

New York has hundreds of courthouses across the state, with court business largely conducted in person pre-pandemic.

The Problem

When the pandemic hit and courts were forced to work remotely, it highlighted the need for an updated website and online court services.

Access to justice and a fair, impartial, and accessible legal system for all is a key principal of our justice system.  However, the majority of the civil or criminal litigants are people of color, in high-volume courts with fewer resources. The effect is a second-class system of justice for people of color in New York State.

The Solution

Design a user-centered, responsive court site with online services to increase access to justice and reduce the need for in-person visits.

My Role

Research, UX, UI

Tools

Figma, Miro, Otter, Flowmapp, Gloomaps

Project Scope

6 weeks
Self-Guided project with feedback from mentor + peers

RESEARCH

I had to deepen my knowledge about the courts and their new online process before I did interviews, so I would be able to understand what users were talking about.

There were many relevant reports and articles, so I took a week to read, recruit for interviews and create a research plan.

See Research Plan

Secondary Research Goals

NY State Courts were forced to swiftly adapt to working remotely during Covid. I learned how NY and Courts across the country were handling remote work.

See Market Research Report

Virtual Court: The Good

  • The courts added e-filing to all courts and made it mandatory for attorneys
  • NYS conducted Virtual Court Hearings through Microsoft Teams
  • Pilot programs for Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) have been a success in NY and other states
A New York City Family Court virtual courtroom is pictured during the coronavirus shutdown in March. (Courtesy of OCA)

Virtual Court: The Challenging

  • Not everyone has equipment or a service plan that allows them to use virtual courts.  (Only 81% of New Yorkers have internet) This increases the Access to Justice Gap
  • Not everyone is familiar with zoom & video conferencing tools, especially Men age 5o+, non-college educated according to a national survey
  • Legislature is required to use certain online systems
A litigant uses a kiosk to appear virtually in Housing Court at the Bronx County Courthouse

Civil Court has the most trial filings in NY State, so Civil Court would be a good area to prioritize for design

What is the 'Access to Justice Gap'?

The Access to Justice Gap is the difference between the civil legal needs of low-income Americans and resources to meet those needs.

Without legal assistance, individuals can struggle to navigate complex court procedures. Yet, the high cost representation means 80% of low income individuals cannot afford to hire an attorney. Very few people qualify for free legal aid, and instead must self represent. They are in high-volume, crowded courts like Bronx Housing Court.

Bronx Housing Court is one of the busiest courts, with over 2,000 people coming to court a day (in the before-times)

A long line of tenants wait to enter Bronx housing court in 2015. [Photo: Adi Talwar]

Who were the people I needed to interview to learn about their court experiences?

Provisional Personas helped me identify who to speak to.

I defined my Provisional Personas based on my Market Research. I was focusing on interviewing self-representing litigants and attorneys who represented them, as these are the people most affected by the access to justice gap.

Primary Research

Goals

Recruiting research participants was difficult.  I was asking people to share sensitive, personal information with me, and they didn’t know me.

Some attorneys were hesitant to speak with me because they didn't want it to affect their professional relationships.

What I did to respect their comfort level was be transparent with how I was going to use the information, ensure confidentiality, and offer to let them review my notes after and remove anything they did not want me to use. It didn’t come to that, but it helped build trust.
See Interview Script
Ideally I would have stood outside a courthouse to recruit, but with NYC at a high alert for Covid, I recruited online. I emailed non-profit organizations, friends and found users through Craigslist.

Interview Participants

4 Public Defender Attorneys

6 Court Users

Collective Experience: Civil, Family & Criminal Court

Primary Research Findings

In order to review my research findings I created an Empathy Map to look for patterns and insights.

Key Insights from user interviews

1. Navigating the website is frustrating and takes many clicks

In order to get to 'x' have to go thru whole alphabet

PARTICIPANT 2 - Court User

2. People appreciate the convenience of virtual conferences

People would often spend all day in court waiting for a 15 min. case to be called

The great thing about it is because you're already at home, it gives me so much more wiggle room to be accommodating to the clients. A lot of my clients have kids and prefer meeting 7:30 -8pm.

PARTICIPANT 6- Attorney

I was more anxious in person than virtually

PARTICIPANT 8- Court User

3. Users want to be heard and tell their side of the story

Litigants spoke about feeling judged and looked down on in the courts. They want to be seen as a person and have their stories heard.

They have a perception. 'You're a degenerate, you're not paying your rent, you're trying to game the system.' But not everybody's in housing court because they can't pay their rent, there's other issues going along with that.

PARTICIPANT 2 - Court User

User Persona

I created my User Persona to summarize my research findings, including the goals and the needs of the target user.

DEFINE & STRATEGY

HMW

Help Erika’s time not be wasted waiting for court cases to start?

HMW

Help Erika get the information she needs with less clicks?

HMW

Ensure Erika feels heard?

Users goal is to handle their case and resolve it quickly. The Courts goal is to maintain access to the courts remotely, increase efficiency and improve their website with online tools

I identified user goals from my interviews, and read about the Organization Goals from the Administration reports and press releases.

Brainstorming

I used a mind-mapping technique to come up with as many ideas as possible. I also used ‘Worst Possible Idea’ where I was stuck on the harder questions to help me generate ideas. I also had a brainstorming discussion with a friend from Housing Court about pre-trial conferences to understand what part of the process I could re-create online, and this led to the idea for Online Dispute Resolution.

Project Roadmap

Prioritizing a new Landing Page, User Dashboard and Online Dispute Resolution feature

My goal was to have users see the most important info on the landing page and navigate to their dashboard to start or manage cases.

I was also excited to build an Online Dispute Resolution feature for Housing court that would allow landlords and tenants to come to an agreement digitally. This would increase efficiency for litigants and the courts.

A development team was not going to be able to implement everything at once. To manage the work I prioritized the must-have features for an MVP, and categorized the effort to execute them.

New Information Architecture to update a legacy site

I noticed most attorneys who used the site did a google search to find the page they were looking for, rather than navigate from the home page. Self-representing users managed to track their cases, but forget finding answers to other questions. So it was clear the Information Architecture was due for an update. I created a framework for the pages, and where information would go in the future.

DESIGN

Focusing on the High-Impact Features

The key tasks users needed to accomplish were identified and task flows were created to begin to visualize the steps and get it down onto paper. Each step built on the next, as I went into more and more detail and began sketching each screen necessary to complete the tasks.

Task Flows

I focused this large project by creating task flows for users to achieve their goals. I created user flows to further empathize how people would use the site.

Sketching out the pages

I created my UI Requirements to organize what information users would need on each page before sketching.

I addressed Erika’s need to find information with less clicks by adding buttons and links for functions users needed most to the homepage. I also thought about how experienced users, like attorneys, should be able to login from the home page easily.

PROTOTYPE & TEST

Mid-Fi Wireframes & Prototype created for testing the navigation and information presented

Screens were created for a user to complete each task flow in a prototype.

Focusing on the Homepage and eCourts

By testing on a Mid-Fi Prototype I could get feedback on the navigation and content of the homepage and dashboard faster than if I waited until the Hi-Fi Prototype was ready. And quick feedback would help me with my layouts which I wanted to polish further.

Usability Testing

5 users participated in a ‘Think-Aloud’ usability test to see if the design was usable and useful.

See Usability Test Plan

Test Objectives:

Overall Test Results

Completion rate (the average percentage of tasks the user was able to complete):

Error Free rate (the percentage of tasks completed without errors or confusions):

Testing navigation to find information

Task- You have a case in housing court, find your case status

Completion Rate= 40%

Insight

Users expect to see most important items at top of Dashboard

Recommendation

Dashboard needs better visual hierarchy so people see most important info here and less distractions.

Users easily found their next court appearance date

Task - Find your next Court appearance Date

Completion Rate= 100%
*Since this info was at the top of the dashboard users found it easily.
Users also noticed it was a virtual hearing, which was excellent.

Understanding the ODR process

Task -  Register for ODR, complete questions and confirm agreement. You can't pay your rent and your landlord is taking you to court to get it.

Completion Rate= 100%
Users completed the task but had some questions along the way, so there's opportunity to make the process smoother.

Insight

The timeline dates are confusing.  
Users wondered "How do they know the dates?" "What do they mean?" "What if the other party is late?"

Recommendation

Timeline is a good tool but there are too many dates. Keep final due date, remove others. Give Explanations.

UI & BRANDING

Creating a Modern, Bold & Approachable Branding and UI

The website is stuck in the 90's- early 2000's

PARTICIPANT 1 - Attorney

The interface was in need of an update, as users found it to be old looking and the colors unappealing. A new look would give users more confidence in the site and make it more pleasant to use. I defined the brand attributes as MODERN, BOLD, APPROACHABLE, FAIR, JUSTICE.

I created mood boards for Color, Typography and Logo inspiration with images fitting these attributes.

I built a reference of the brand style for myself and future stakeholders that could be updated as more components were added in the future.

UI KIT

Priority Revisions

Dashboard needed revision to clearly feature the important information.

Users found the dashboard confusing and were having information overload. I looked at sites for layout and design pattern ideas, and re-worked my dashboard to feature the most essential information

Making the timeline more understandable

Usability test recommendations are incorporated into the Hi-Fi Mock Up

The Finished Prototype

Adding color allowed me to highlight where I needed to user to look and interact

The new homepage layout makes it easy to find courts, phone number to call, and highlights new features available online.

Why is this important?

The original website was hard to find information on and it looked outdated. Now the page has a modern look and is easy to navigate.

Responsive Screens for the homepage based on Bootstrap framework

Why is this important?

Ensures viewability on any device

The dashboard was another key screen so I created responsive layouts here as well

Now you can quickly search for a case

Why is this important?

Most court users and attorneys I interviewed used this function. Previously, it took four clicks (and guessing the correct menu to look under and correct court database). Here the databases are combined so the user enters the # and the database does the work.

Court users can login to their dashboard and manage their case online

Why is this important?

There is no centralized online process for filing case documents. This digitizes the process so it can be accessed remotely.

The new Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) feature for Housing Court allows landlords and tenants to come to an agreement online prior to appearing before the judge

Why is this important?

This benefits self-represented users who don't qualify for free representation but can't afford an attorney, and are comfortable using the computer.

Some of the court users I interviewed had been to court several times for the same issue and knew what to do. They would be able to resolve their case online if it was an option.

By digitizing uncontested resolutions, it frees up the courts' time for other matters. See ODR

A tenant fills out a resolution and agrees to the terms

BACK TO TOP

Conclusion

I addressed important needs of the user to easily find information, and the organization to improve efficiency.  A usable site benefits everyone, but especially minority self-representing users by saving them time so they can access the courts with less disruption to their lives.

What I Learned

Next Steps

RESUME

©2026 Kim Scerbinski - Designed with Webflow